ASVe, Bailo a Costantinopoli, Carte turche, Busta 250, Fascicle 331, 84
Member of
Date Created
1605-05-23 (uncertain)
Language
Resource Type
Genre
Physical Form
Page Total
32
Rights
Digital content found in the UTSC Library's Digital Collections are meant for research and private study used in compliance with copyright legislation. Access to digital, and the technical capacity to download or copy it, does not imply permission to re-use. Prior written permission to publish, or otherwise use content, must be obtained from the copyright holder. Please contact the UTSC Library for further information.
Topic
English Summary - Plain
Order sent to the beylerbeyi of Mısır upon the bailo's request regarding the dispute between an Ottoman subject, Mehmed, and the Venetian bailo in Egypt. Mehmed, who had been enslaved by warring corsairs and then freed, claimed that the previous Venetian bailo in Egypt, Cevan Kosto, guaranteed to cover his losses and went to the Porte to demand the mentioned losses from the new Venetian bailo in Egypt with documents. In the court attended by the Grandvizier Mehmed Paşa, his case was dropped and a fetva was given indicating that the new Venetian bailo was not responsbile for his losses. However, Mehmed continued to oppress the bailo by showing some orders. The beylerbeyi of Egypt is ordered not to allow him to oppress the bailo. If Mehmed presents any orders from the Porte, the beylerbeyi is ordered to delay processing and contact Istanbul.
English Genre
Gregorian Date Qualifier
Hijiri Date
Evail-i Muharrem 1014:Eva'il
Hijiri Date Qualifier
Schema Type
Manuscript
Identifier
61220/utsc66674
Agency
Local Identifier
Carte_Turche_106
Gregorian Date (RAD)
5/23/1605
Reformatting Quality
preservation
Digital Origin
reformatted digital
Internet Media Type
Cataloguing Language
English Summary
Order sent to the beylerbeyi of Mısır upon the bailo's request regarding the dispute between an Ottoman subject, Mehmed, and the Venetian bailo in Egypt. Mehmed, who had been enslaved by warring corsairs and then freed, claimed that the previous Venetian bailo in Egypt, Cevan Kosto, guaranteed to cover his losses and went to the Porte to demand the mentioned losses from the new Venetian bailo in Egypt with documents. In the court attended by the Grandvizier Mehmed Paşa, his case was dropped and a fetva was given indicating that the new Venetian bailo was not responsbile for his losses. However, Mehmed continued to oppress the bailo by showing some orders. The beylerbeyi of Egypt is ordered not to allow him to oppress the bailo. If Mehmed presents any orders from the Porte, the beylerbeyi is ordered to delay processing and contact Istanbul.
Viewer Override